There's an explanation for our struggle with universal health care: the big government-small government debate. Those in favor of small government lost the social security debate and they lost the universal-health-care-for-old-people debate (medicare) and they lost the universal-health-care-for-poor-people debate (medicaid) but so far they have won the universal-health-care-for-everyone-else debate. They support their position by throwing out horror stories: death panel juries, government control of your health, year-long waits to see the doctor. Those stories get debunked but they stuck with enough voters to obscure the real issues.
Proponents of insurance believe the market place is a better vehicle for all things monetary. More on this argument in a minute.
Very wealthy proponents of insurance prefer we all pay insurance for health coverage rather than taxes for health coverage, because the very wealthy pay much higher taxes than the rest of us. If you earn $50,000 a year and pay 15% in taxes, your tax bill is $7,500. If you earn $500,000 a year and pay 15% in taxes, your tax bill is $75,000. If you earn $5,000,000 a year and pay 15% in taxes, your tax bill is $750,000. Ignoring the 85% that we all get to keep, one might feel sorry for the poor soul paying more in taxes in a single year than the average Joe earns in 15 years. One might feel sorry. If only we could forget the $4,250,000 the poor soul kept that year. It will take 85 years for our average Joe to earn $4,250,000. One might feel sorry.
Regarding the market place's superiority for business, I don't think health care is a product like a car, a house, a cell phone, or a piece of fruit. Those items can be bought cheaply or extravagantly and you usually get what you pay for. It should be up to the buyer to decide if she wants or can afford a fancy or a simple house, a souped up or basic car or no car at all. Health care, however, shouldn't be a luxury that comes in various qualities according to your income. I mean basic health care. We should all be entitled to equal health care. The wealthy may want fancier rooms, and they can pay for them, but we should all have access to the same drugs, surgeries, and medical advice. As surgical discoveries and new drugs emerge, we should all have equal access. Why? Why you ask.
We should all have equal access to health care because as a society we can afford equal access and as a society we should legislate equal access.
But wait. Why can't every law abiding citizen pay for their own darn health care? We all pay for our own food, our own housing, our own clothes, don't we. Heck, why can't we all pay for our own schooling too? How about our own fire fighters, and cops?